Official Title
Germline DNA-Based Radiosensitivity Biomarker Influence on Toxicity Following Prostate Radiotherapy
Brief Title
Germline DNA-Based Radiosensitivity Biomarker Influence on Toxicity Following Prostate Radiotherapy, GARUDA Trial
Protocol ID
NCT04624256
Lead Sponsor
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
Brief Summary
This trial studies the changes in long-term physician-scored genitourinary toxicity
achieved in prostate cancer patients eligible for stereotactic radiation therapy when
both patients and physicians have access to convincing but non-validated germline
signature that can characterize patients as having a low or high risk of developing
toxicity after radiation therapy. The information learned from this study may guide
patients' and physicians' decisions on radiotherapy fractionation.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To determine the impact on the 2-year cumulative incidence of late grade ≥2
genitourinary (GU) physician-scored toxicity, as assessed by the Common Terminology
Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 scale, caused by presenting both the
physicians and patients with the results of a non-prospectively validated biomarker panel
that dichotomizes any given patient into having a high versus a low risk of late grade ≥2
GU physician-scored toxicity following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the late grade ≥2 genitourinary (GU) physician-scored toxicity, as
assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03
scale, in patients who test positive for the biomarker.
II. To determine the late grade ≥2 genitourinary (GU) physician-scored toxicity, as
assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03
scale, in patients who test negative for the biomarker.
III. To observe the proportions of patients who choose to receive conventionally
fractionated radiotherapy, moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy, and SBRT, based on
being positive or negative for the biomarker thought to predict for late grade ≥2 GU
toxicity.
To determine the 2- and 5-year cumulative incidences of late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal
(GI) physician-reported toxicity, as assessed by the CTCAE version 4.03 scale, following
the same intervention as for the primary objective.
IV. To determine the incidence of acute grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicity as assessed by the
CTCAE version 4.03 scale, following the same intervention as for the primary objective.
V. To quantify the temporal changes in patient-reported quality of life (QOL) outcomes,
as assessed by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-26 (EPIC-26), International Prostate
Symptom Scores (IPSS), and Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) QOL indices, following
the same intervention as for the primary objective.
VI. To determine the 5-year cumulative incidence of late grade ≥2 GU physician-reported
toxicity, as assessed by the CTCAE version 4.03 scale.
OUTLINE:
Patients planning to undergo SBRT per standard of care undergo collection of cheek swab
and blood samples for the analysis of germline biomarkers. Afterwards, patients and their
physicians engage in discussion about which form of radiotherapy to proceed with. Based
on the decision, patients predicted to be at low risk of toxicity with SBRT continue to
receive SBRT over 14 days while patients predicted to be at high risk of toxicity with
SBRT will be counseled to undergo either conventionally fractionated radiotherapy over
63-70 days, moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy over 28-35 days, or may opt to still
receive SBRT over 14 days per standard of care.
After completion of radiotherapy treatment, patients are followed up at 1 ,3, 6, 9, 12,
18, and 24 months, and then every 6 months for 4 years.
Study Period
-
Enrollment Count
208 participants
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically confirmed, clinical localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate
- No evidence of disease beyond the prostate and/or seminal vesicles (i.e., no
suspicious pelvic lymph nodes or presence of metastatic disease outside the pelvis)
- Staging workup as recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) on
the basis of risk grouping:
- Low risk: No staging workup required
- Favorable intermediate-risk: computed tomography (CT) abdomen/pelvis only if
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram predicts > 10%
probability of lymph node involvement (note: CT simulation scan will count as a
CT abdomen/pelvis)
- Unfavorable intermediate-risk: technetium bone scan, CT abdomen/pelvis if MSKCC
nomogram predicts > 10% probability of lymph node involvement (note: CT
simulation scan will count as a CT abdomen/pelvis)
- High-risk: technetium bone scan, CT abdomen/pelvis if MSKCC nomogram predicts >
10% probability of lymph node involvement (note: CT simulation scan will count
as a CT abdomen/pelvis) =
- Advanced imaging studies (i.e. prostate specific membrane antigen [PSMA]
positron emission tomography [PET] and Axumin scan) can supplant a bone scan if
performed first
- Ability to understand, and willingness to sign, the written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with neuroendocrine or small cell carcinoma of the prostate
- Patients with any evidence of distant metastases. Note, evidence of lymphadenopathy
below the level of the renal arteries can be deemed loco regional per the discretion
of the investigator
- Prior whole-gland cryosurgery, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) or
brachytherapy of the prostate
- Prior pelvic radiotherapy
- History of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or ataxia telangiectasia
Filters
Prostate Adenocarcinoma
Stage I Prostate Cancer American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) v8
Stage II Prostate Cancer AJCC v8
Stage IIA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8
Stage IIB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8
Stage IIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8
NA
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT